Ethics of Online Platforms: Do They Have a Duty to Protect Us?

Introduction:

The previous blog post touched on how seemingly innocent information shared online can be misused by cybercriminals. But this raises another question: What is the role of online platforms in protecting us from these dangers? Should they be responsible for educating users, preventing oversharing, or enforcing stricter privacy settings? In this blog, I’ll explore the ethical responsibilities of online platforms in ensuring user safety and privacy, especially in an age where personal data is treated as currency.

The Exploitation of User Data:

Online platforms have built their business models around data collection. Every post, location check-in, or photo shared provides platforms with valuable insights into user behavior, which can be monetized through targeted advertising and other services. While users may see benefits from this—such as personalized recommendations—there is a darker side. The more data platforms collect, the greater the risk that this information can be misused or mishandled, either by the platforms themselves or by malicious actors.

A growing concern is how platforms balance their pursuit of profit with their duty to protect users. Recent privacy scandals, such as the Cambridge Analytica scandal, have highlighted the risks associated with large-scale data collection and the potential for misuse. In such cases, the information shared by users in good faith was repurposed for political manipulation, without their consent.

Do Platforms Have a Duty to Educate Users?

One of the main arguments in favor of platform responsibility is that many users are unaware of the risks they take when sharing personal information. Studies have shown that users often misunderstand privacy policies and assume that platforms offer more protection than they actually do. Given the complexity of privacy settings and the technical nature of online security, it’s difficult for the average user to fully grasp the extent to which their information is exposed.

Ethically, platforms could do more to educate users on these risks. For instance, they could introduce clearer privacy options, provide warnings before users share location-based data, or offer regular reminders about the importance of safeguarding personal information. Some argue that platforms should even implement default privacy settings that prioritize user safety, rather than encouraging oversharing.

The Dangers of Over-Collecting Data:

Another ethical issue lies in the sheer amount of data that platforms collect. Every time users interact with a platform, they leave behind digital breadcrumbs, from their browsing history to their physical location. Platforms often use this data to create detailed user profiles that can be used to predict behaviors, preferences, and vulnerabilities. In doing so, they not only risk user privacy but also create opportunities for this data to be exploited.

For instance, location-based services can track users' movements in real-time, exposing them to risks like stalking or targeted advertising based on their physical location. Even when users trust platforms with their data, the potential for breaches or leaks remains a serious concern. A study found that nearly half of all large companies have experienced some form of data breach, exposing sensitive user information to hackers and criminals.

GDPR and the Balance of Power:

In response to growing privacy concerns, regulatory frameworks like the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) have been introduced to give users more control over their data. GDPR requires platforms to be transparent about how they collect and use data and allows users to request the deletion of their information. While this has been a step forward, it hasn’t completely solved the problem.

Platforms continue to find ways to work within the boundaries of GDPR while still profiting from user data. In some cases, they obscure the extent of data collection through long and complex terms of service agreements. This raises ethical questions about whether platforms are doing enough to prioritize user safety over their financial interests.

User Autonomy vs. Platform Responsibility:

One of the most contentious debates around platform responsibility is the balance between user autonomy and platform intervention. Should users be free to share as much personal information as they like, or should platforms step in to prevent risky behaviors? Some argue that platforms should take a more paternalistic approach, using algorithms to flag or prevent risky sharing, while others believe that this would infringe on users' rights to control their own online presence.

The ethical question boils down to whether platforms should protect users from themselves. By allowing unrestricted sharing, platforms may be leaving users vulnerable to threats they don’t fully understand. However, too much intervention could lead to censorship and a loss of personal freedom.

Conclusion:

The ethical responsibilities of online platforms are complex and multifaceted. While they profit from the data users share, they must also balance this with the need to protect their users from harm. As the digital world evolves, platforms will need to rethink their approaches to privacy and safety, ensuring that they do more to educate users about the risks of oversharing and offer robust protections against data misuse.

In the next blog, I will explore a hypothetical system, designed to showcase how innocent data can be used for harmful purposes, raising awareness about the ethical dangers of unchecked data sharing.

Resources:

Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends”: Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143-1168.

Federal Bureau of Investigation (2014). Internet social networking risks. FBI Investigative Report. http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/investigate/counterintelligence/internet-social-networking-risks .

Padgette, J., Bahr, J., Batra, M., Holtmann, M., Smithbey, R., Chen, L., & Scarfone, K. (2017). Guide to Bluetooth Security (Revision 2). National Institute of Standards and Technology.

Waters, S., & Ackerman, J. (2011). Exploring privacy management on Facebook: Motivations and perceived consequences of voluntary disclosure. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17(1), 101-115.