Building a Safer Online Dating World: A Procedural Framework for Screening Offenders

Introduction

Having discussed the risks and ethical challenges of online dating platforms in my previous blogs, it’s now time to explore a potential solution. This entry focuses on a procedural framework designed to enhance safety on online dating services by screening convicted sex offenders (CSOs). I will delve into how this system operates and its implications for users, platforms, and society at large. As online dating continues to grow in popularity, the need for effective safety measures has become paramount.

The Need for a Safety Framework

Online dating platforms, while offering convenience, have become susceptible to misuse. The anonymity these platforms offer, combined with minimal verification processes, has led to increased exploitation. Users are vulnerable to predators who can create fake identities and bypass the limited safety checks currently in place. This framework seeks to address these vulnerabilities by mandating thorough background checks on users before they can access online dating services.

The concept of background checks in online dating is not entirely new. In the U.S., certain dating platforms have been screening users against sex offender registries since 2011, following high-profile lawsuits. However, in countries like the Netherlands, there is no public registry of convicted sex offenders, leaving a significant gap in user protection. This framework aims to bridge that gap by implementing a more stringent verification process, requiring users to obtain a "Certificate of Good Behavior" (VOG) before joining a dating platform.

The System Explained

The proposed system is specifically designed for the Netherlands, based on the Dutch legal framework and the role of Justis, the Dutch State Secretary for Justice and Security’s screening authority. The core of this system lies in the requirement that users provide a "Certificate of Good Behavior" (VOG), a document that confirms they have no criminal record, particularly related to sexual offenses. The VOG is a key component of the Dutch justice system used to screen individuals for various professional and personal purposes, including employment and now, potentially, for online dating.

This framework, aligned with Dutch law, involves the interaction between the user, the online dating service, and Justis. When a user applies to create a profile, the dating platform requests verification from Justis, ensuring that only users who pass this background check can proceed. This process integrates privacy-by-design principles and complies with GDPR regulations, ensuring that users’ data is handled securely and remains protected throughout.

A step-by-step diagram for the proposed framework

How the Framework Works

The process begins when a user applies to create a profile on a dating site. The dating service automatically submits a request to Justis for a VOG. If the user passes the background check, the platform allows them to create a profile. Should a criminal history related to sexual offenses be found, the user is denied access. The system ensures that only users with a clean history can engage on these platforms, significantly lowering the risk for other users.

The system is built on trust, but also on technology that ensures privacy and compliance with European privacy laws, such as the GDPR. User data is processed securely, with minimal intrusion, and is deleted if the application process is not completed within a reasonable time (typically 90 days). The procedural framework also ensures that users do not need to resubmit background checks for each platform they join—once cleared, their VOG can be used across multiple services, streamlining the process for frequent online daters.

Challenges to Implementation

While this framework offers a much-needed solution, it is not without its challenges. One significant issue is privacy. Users may be hesitant to provide personal information or undergo background checks due to concerns about how their data is used or shared. Furthermore, the GDPR places strict limitations on how platforms can collect and store personal data, making it crucial that the system complies fully with these regulations.

Another concern is cost. Requiring users to obtain a VOG could impose financial barriers that may discourage some people from using online dating platforms. Additionally, dating services may be reluctant to implement such a system due to the potential loss of users and increased administrative burdens.

Social and Ethical Implications

Ethically, the framework presents a dilemma. While its purpose is to protect users, it could also lead to the social exclusion of former offenders who have served their sentences and are trying to reintegrate into society. The concept of “once a criminal, always a criminal” is a dangerous precedent to set, and care must be taken to ensure that the system does not unnecessarily stigmatize people who pose no ongoing risk to society.

Furthermore, the framework only screens for past offenses, meaning first-time offenders or those who have never been caught could still slip through the cracks. This creates the risk of a false sense of security among users, who may believe the platform is entirely safe simply because a screening system is in place. Users must be reminded that, while the system can reduce risks, it cannot eliminate them altogether.

There is also the question of whether dating platforms should bear the responsibility for enforcing such a system. Critics argue that it may be an unfair burden on these businesses, which are already navigating complex regulatory landscapes. Others suggest that the state should take a more active role in enforcing safety standards across online platforms.

The Future of Safe Online Dating

Despite the challenges, this framework represents a promising step toward creating a safer online dating environment. By introducing more stringent checks and fostering accountability, it can significantly reduce the risks posed by predators on dating platforms. However, for the system to be effective, it must be continually evaluated and adapted to address both technological advancements and evolving social attitudes.

Ongoing collaboration between dating platforms and governments will be essential to ensure that the system functions without infringing on personal privacy rights or disproportionately affecting certain user groups. As online dating continues to grow in popularity, the need for such frameworks will only increase. With the right balance of safety, privacy, and ethical consideration, we can create a digital space where people can connect without fear of exploitation.

Conclusion

The procedural framework proposed for screening convicted sex offenders offers a concrete way to enhance safety on online dating platforms. However, it also raises critical questions about privacy, ethics, and the role of online platforms in protecting users. The implementation of this system, while complex, could serve as a model for how technology and legislation can work together to reduce online risks.

As the online dating landscape continues to evolve, it is crucial for stakeholders—platforms, users, and governments—to collaborate in creating safer, more trustworthy environments for all. The future of online dating lies in finding the delicate balance between user freedom, privacy, and security.

Resources:

Kelly M. Babchishin, R. Karl Hanson, and Chantal A. Hermann. 2011. The characteristics of online sex offenders: A meta-analysis. Sexual Abuse: Journal of Research and Treatment 23, 1 (2011), 92–123.

Ann Cavoukian. 2011. Privacy by design in law, policy and practice. A white paper for regulators, decision-makers and policy-makers (2011).

Lawrence E Cohen and Marcus Felson. 1979. Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American sociological review (1979), 588–608.

Maureen Horcher. 2011. World Wide Web of Love, Lies, and Legislation: Why Online Dating Websites Should Screen Members. J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 29 (2011), 251.

Jill S Levenson, Yolanda N Brannon, Timothy Fortney, and Juanita Baker. 2007. Public perceptions about sex offenders and community protection policies. Anal- yses of Social Issues and Public Policy 7, 1 (2007), 137–161.

Michael Petrunik and Linda Deutschmann. 2008. The exclusion-inclusion spectrum in state and community response to sex. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 52, 5 (2008), 499–519.

The European Parliament And The Council of The European Union. 2016. REG- ULATION (EU) 2016/679. (2016). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32016R0679